Search for: "Redevelopment Agency of the City of Stockton"
Results 1 - 17
of 17
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2011, 2:04 pm
We reverse the grant of summary judgment for the Agency on the nuisance and Polanco Act-Water Code provision issues and remand for entry of summary judgment for the Appellants. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 10:32 am
There are no redevelopment agencies to acquire the property necessary, but cities like Fremont can work with developers, and use their powers of eminent domain where necessary for related improvements, such as the extension of Capitol Avenue. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 1:35 pm
Redevelopment Agency of the City of Stockton v. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 1:06 pm
Ambac filed the lawsuit to force Hercules to use $4.1 million of tax-increment revenue collected in December by its now defunct redevelopment agency for a $2.4 million bond payment that was due last month. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 8:30 pm
The general fund owes $16.8 million to the redevelopment agency, and is looking at a $1.2 million current-year budget deficit on top of that. [read post]
27 Sep 2012, 4:19 pm
This $95 million dollars is a mixture of bonds related to the sewer system in Atwater as well its now-defunct Atwater redevelopment agency. [read post]
19 Sep 2012, 1:56 pm
City of Stockton (2010) 48 Cal.4th 481, which stated in part that plaintiffs “may not, for purposes of the statute of limitations, go behind the agency’s declaration in an NOE that it has approved a project. [read post]
19 Sep 2012, 1:56 pm
City of Stockton (2010) 48 Cal.4th 481, which stated in part that plaintiffs “may not, for purposes of the statute of limitations, go behind the agency’s declaration in an NOE that it has approved a project. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 6:59 am
Now if only I could divert the money as well Once again the journalist gets his descriptions deceptively wrong – the state isn’t “diverting” the money, which implies volition, the redevelopment agencies were abolished by law. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 11:51 am
City of Glendora (2010) 182 Cal.App.4th 573, 579 [declining to interpret CEQA as requiring that agencies waive their customar [read post]
1 Jun 2021, 8:52 am
City of Stockton (2010) 48 Cal.4th 481, 502.) [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 10:22 am
City of Stockton (2010) 48, Cal.4th 481; Committee for Green Foothills v. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 3:19 pm
The appellate court held that the revised EIR did not need to address urban “blight” conditions contained in the Redevelopment Agency documents because “blight” and “urban decay” are two separate issues. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 10:22 am
City of Stockton (2010) 48, Cal.4th 481; Committee for Green Foothills v. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 3:18 pm
In October of 1998, the City of Stockton (“City”) filed an eminent domain action to acquire the owner’s property. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 10:20 am
City of Stockton (2010) 48 Cal.4th 481, 499.) [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 9:50 am
Many are the candidates, everything from the state’s shadow bankruptcy, its abolition of redevelopment agencies, its many municipal bankruptcies (Vallejo, Stockton), or even its remarkable repudiation of public-sector pension guarantees (San Jose, San Diego). [read post]
